x

Log In
Please log in to like this:
Email:
Password:
Log In
Forgot Password?
Not a PodOmatic member? Sign up
(It's quick and free.)
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature Building a Compelling Case for ID
Loader
Loader
Podcast: Intelligent Design The Future
Rank: #13
Category: Science & Medicine
City: Seattle
Tell your friends about this:
50 chars max.
- or -
Post to Facebook
Facebook may ask you to re-enter your message.
Close
Link (copy to Facebook or IM):

On this episode of ID The Future, Casey Luskin puts to rest once and for all the common assertion by opponents of intelligent design that there are no scientific papers supporting the claims of ID. This wasn't true in 2005 when Eugenie Scott of the NCSE stated it on MSNBC and it certainly isn't true six years later. Luskin discusses the most recent scientific paper, by Stephen Meyer and Paul Nelson, and talks about the importance of the peer-reviewed scientific literature: "These papers collectively make a case that intelligent causation is necessary to produce the sort of biological complexity that we are discovering in the cell today."


Title: Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature Building a Compelling Case for ID
Author: Discovery Institute
Description: On this episode of ID The Future, Casey Luskin puts to rest once and for all the common assertion by opponents of intelligent design that there are no scientific papers supporting the claims of ID. This wasn't true in 2005 when Eugenie Scott of the NCSE stated it on MSNBC and it certainly isn't true six years later. Luskin discusses the most recent scientific paper, by Stephen Meyer and Paul Ne...

Comments are disabled for this podcast
x
Embed Code
After customizing your player (optional), copy and paste the embed code above. The code will change based on your selections.
Color:

Size:
300x85
440x85
620x85
Custom
Width: px
Height: 85px

Min. width: 200px


Start playing automatically?
No Yes