History
Icon-add-to-playlist Icon-download Icon-drawer-up
Share this ... ×
...
By ...
Embed:
Embedded player size:
Embedded player preview:

On this episode of ID the Future, Stephen Meyer debates Michael Shermer, founder and publisher of Skeptic Magazine, about how Darwinian evolution should be taught in the public school classroom. Should students be allowed to learn about the scientific challenges to neo-Darwinism? Listen in on this candid discussion.

[PLAY]

On this second episode of ID the Future, Dr. Brian Mattson and Jay Friesen of Dead Reckoning.tv discuss scrutiny of the intelligent design movement with Casey Luskin. They trace opposition not only to alternate worldviews, but also to science historian Thomas Kuhn’s insight that new science paradigms will inevitably face strong resistance from adherents to older theories. Luskin notes progress in recent critiques of Darwinism published in mainstream science literature. Watch the full interview at the Dead Reckoning YouTube channel.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Brian Mattson of Dead Reckoning.tv discusses intelligent design with Casey Luskin. Luskin answers the question, “Is intelligent design really science?” by analyzing the design argument for proteins, taking listeners through the observation, hypothesis, experiment and conclusion steps of the scientific method.

Watch the full interview at the Dead Reckoning YouTube channel.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin talks with Eric Anderson, who has been involved in the intelligent design debate for over a decade. Anderson's primary focus is on analyzing the logical and rhetorical bases of arguments to help people understand strengths, weaknesses, and underlying assumptions of arguments made in the id & evolution debate.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin shows how the human fossil record contradicts the expectations of neo-Darwinian evolution. Luskin takes a close look at the technical literature surrounding human origins and explains why the evidence does not, despite common claims to the contrary, indicate that humans evolved from ape-like precursors.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, hear the final segment of Bill Dembski's appearance on the Gilmore & Glahn radio show. Dembski & Gilmore continue their discussion of advances being made behind the scenes in the overall scientific debate, and the inevitable demise of Darwinian evolution as the predominant theory in life sciences.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, listen to part 3 of Dr. William Dembski's interview on the Gilmore & Glahn radio show. Their conversation covers a wide range of topics, including the current state of the intelligent design movement and where the science is headed over the next decade, as well as the slowly growing number of prominent scientists and scholars who don't accept intelligent design, but also are challenging Darwinian evolution as a failed theory.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses recent incidents that reveal a disturbing trend: Darwin activists are using a “heckler’s veto” to intimidate academic institutions into shutting down scientific inquiry over life’s origins. Listen in as Luskin demonstrates how the heckler’s veto has become the latest tool for suppression of ID-friendly viewpoints.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, learn about some of scientists’ latest attempts to copy sophisticated designs found in the natural world. This emerging science of imitating nature, known as biomimetics, has attracted extensive research and led to new technologies. As uniform experience has shown, such good design comes not from blind processes, but from a good mind.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, hear the second segment of William Dembski's recent appearance on the Gilmore and Glahn radio show. Dembski and Gilmore discuss whether or not intelligent design is science, and what the theory's current status is among scientists.

[PLAY]

Previous Page  |  Next Page