History
Icon-add-to-playlist Icon-download Icon-drawer-up
Share this ... ×
...
By ...
Embed:
Embedded player size:
Embedded player preview:

On this fourth episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss intelligent design research at the Biologic Institute. Luskin also notes that professors lack academic freedom to discuss intelligent design at public institutions, highlighting the case of a physics professor from Ball State University.

[PLAY]

On this third episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss the commitment of intelligent design to “follow the evidence wherever it leads.” While evolutionists have pointed to so-called junk DNA as evidence against intelligent design, Luskin shares about recent findings that it plays critical roles in the cell.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, a retired geneticist from the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, sits down with Casey Luskin to discuss a topic that he has published widely on: the law of recurrent variation. Tune in as Dr. Lönnig gives a background of the law of recurrent variation and explains how efforts in mutation breeding have failed to bring about the expected revolution in plant and animal breeding.

[PLAY]

On this second episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss the question, “Why do people conflate intelligent design with creationism?” Luskin explains the positive argument for intelligent design from DNA and clarifies key distinctions between the religious view of creationism and the scientific theory of intelligent design.

[PLAY]

On this first episode of ID the Future, Nate Herbst of The God Solution and Casey Luskin discuss their experiences as students, interacting with professors over the origins of life controversy. Luskin describes how involvement in a student club first awakened his interested in the intelligent design debate.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Stephen Meyer debates Michael Shermer, founder and publisher of Skeptic Magazine, about how Darwinian evolution should be taught in the public school classroom. Should students be allowed to learn about the scientific challenges to neo-Darwinism? Listen in on this candid discussion.

[PLAY]

On this second episode of ID the Future, Dr. Brian Mattson and Jay Friesen of Dead Reckoning.tv discuss scrutiny of the intelligent design movement with Casey Luskin. They trace opposition not only to alternate worldviews, but also to science historian Thomas Kuhn’s insight that new science paradigms will inevitably face strong resistance from adherents to older theories. Luskin notes progress in recent critiques of Darwinism published in mainstream science literature. Watch the full interview at the Dead Reckoning YouTube channel.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Dr. Brian Mattson of Dead Reckoning.tv discusses intelligent design with Casey Luskin. Luskin answers the question, “Is intelligent design really science?” by analyzing the design argument for proteins, taking listeners through the observation, hypothesis, experiment and conclusion steps of the scientific method.

Watch the full interview at the Dead Reckoning YouTube channel.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin talks with Eric Anderson, who has been involved in the intelligent design debate for over a decade. Anderson's primary focus is on analyzing the logical and rhetorical bases of arguments to help people understand strengths, weaknesses, and underlying assumptions of arguments made in the id & evolution debate.

[PLAY]

On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin shows how the human fossil record contradicts the expectations of neo-Darwinian evolution. Luskin takes a close look at the technical literature surrounding human origins and explains why the evidence does not, despite common claims to the contrary, indicate that humans evolved from ape-like precursors.

[PLAY]

Previous Page  |  Next Page